Graham Ellis - Regular updates - my diary
A Virtual Hub for Melksham
Some questions you may ask
- What is the Melksham weather forecast for tomorrow?
- Where can I park in Melksham, how long and what cost?
- How do I research my Melksham Ancestors / history of my house?
- Are the Melksham trains running on time?
- When is the next meeting of the Melksham Historical Society?
- Where are keep fit classes in Melksham?
- When does the Melksham splash pad and cafe open?
- What's happening in Melksham about climate change?
- When and how can we replace our Melksham councillors?
- When is the next Melksham Council meeting I can bring a question to and is it on Zoom?
- Who is my councillor and how do I contact him/her?
- Where can I exercise my dog in Melksham?
- Where is my nearest playground?
- Do we have a neighbourhood watch? A neighbourhood plan?
- How do I report graffeti?
- Where can my friends, visiting with a child, stay?
- Is there a hairdresser in Melksham?
- Is [task] something for the Town Council or Wiltshire Council?
- What is the difference between Town, Without, and Area Board?
- Which takeways near me are open at the moment?
- When is the next market? Town Centre or Avonside?
- What is at Scoff this week?
- How do I get to the Royal United Hospital?
- What is Parkrun?
- Are the answers I am getting up to date?
I am just one of 15 Town Councillors here in Melksham and on many days. On many days, I write and share online on a topic that I think may be of interest.
In the last week, 265 different people have visited my blog pages, calling up 448 pages. I'm writing this very early on Monday morning and already 66 people have come to my website to view yesterday's post going into detail on car parking charges for the disabled in Melksham, and 92 on the lighting of the Town Hall in the colours of the Ukrainian flag which I posted on Saturday. 70 have looked at the detail of the Melksham play areas written a couple of days area. This is just the tip of the iceberg - Facebook reports 1220 people reached and 280 reactions to my disabled parking post, 741 and 129 to the Ukrainian flag and 1225 and 45 to play areas, 518 and 138 to my post about Waterloo Live at the Assembly Hall. Feedback is varied - there have already been 60 follow up comments on yesterday's parking post (quite a few, I admit from me as I clarify and explain further for people) and that is a valuable two way conversation in both me informing the public and the public informing me ... with other councillors welcome to read should they wish to do so.
There is clearly an appetite for information and discussion - these are not one-shot visitors I have written 126 posts in the last 11 months, and people keep reacting and answering. I am not unique - look at Facebook groups such as "Sham Shoutouts", the Melksham Community Page, Melksham Discussions, Melksham East Resident pages, and so on.
But my information feed like all these others is very "bitty" - it's one of many, and there is no common indexing. We do co-operate and share (to a greater or lesser extent - a few are protective of their data)
The Virtual Hub project
Your Town Council's Community Development Committee meets a week today (7th March 2022). at their last meeting, they set up a working group of three members to look to procuring a "virtual hub" to bring all these things together, with another councillor volunteering to help them come up with a specification for what they need. I look forward to hearing their report. This is not an easy task, and there is a danger of a lot of money and effort being poured into a project that's only partial and gets limited traction. There is also the possibility of coming up with something rather good.
I set up an online forum and information source (relating to the rail campaigning I do) over a decade ago, and it's still running to this day - a little long in the tooth, but we still have some 4,000 visits per (last) week, with members adding some 300 new items in that time which keeps encouraging people back. It included a map showing immediate issues with trains across the South West, a news feed from the BBC about "things transport", an "On this day", and a searchable archive of some 20,000 topics we've covered and 1,500 mirrored industry documents. There's a hot topic box showing what people are most liking, and a diary of events coming up that people can attend or consultations they can reply to. And there's a polling capability where we can survey our members. About 10 members have been appointed as "moderators" - our inner team who are regular visitors and who can step in if necessary and sort out issues they spot in their day to day visits without it being a big maintenance job. There are a number of things I would like to improve as "webmaster" ... it's not very good in presentation on tablets and mobile phones ... printing out pages for people not on line to take away has some formatting issues ... searching for things is a bit rudimentary ... feeding out to and in from Facebook and Twitter is not as automated as I would like. See http://www.passenger.chat if you want to take a look at this example of a "virtual hub".
The specification and writing of the software and initial "go live" for the system feels like a big task, and I wish the working group well. They really need to consider at this stage the lifetime maintenance cost of the software which will most likely by a higher figure, and the data entry and update effort which will - if the system succeeds - dwarf the other two elements combined.
The system specification is looking at the heart of the system - the engine. Inputs, outputs and feeds are important, as is how the system will be marketed to attract people to come along, read the posts and contribute in the crowded information world. Audience retention (with personalisation) and communication between, and moderation also need to be considered. Well planned and with a blaze of publicity with well populated pages at launch, it can take off well; there may then be a bit of a dip as it's no longer the "latest and greatest" news and will require perseverance and investment in encouraging and making contributions. I look forward to seeing this coming together - happy to make further comment if invited, and indeed I have already passed through ideas and thoughts to the lead officer.
Look at the questions at the top of this post, and the £64,000 questions
- are the answers I'm getting up to date, or from last year?
- what rules and guidelines do we set and how do we develop and apply them?
- can I advertise here and how do I do it?
- how do those without Internet access find out these things?
- can we to a tailored periodic compendium by email?
- how do I get my own thoughts and events added to and found on this data pool?
Not my project - but I wish them well and hope that they will at least take a look at my inputs and do a quick "check list" run to ensure they're aware and have given appropriate consideration to the items I raise.
I look forward to being the "Virtual Hub" being flagged up on my daily feeds when there is something of interest in the future, of it being my "go to" when I want to navigate to anything Melksham, and being able to easily add content there from time to time.
Published Monday, 28th February 2022
PAID Blue Badge parking in Melksham from 1.4.2022 ?!
Parking in Melksham for "Disabled Drivers" - blue badge holders.
At present (until 1st April 2022), Blue Badge holders may park in Wiltshire Council Car Parks in Melksham free of charge, provided they follow national blue badge rules including display of the badge. Wiltshire Council provided 20 spaces across the Melksham car parks (and another 310 in other Wiltshire locations) which are usually wider that the regular spaces, reserved for badge holders, and close to the pedestrian exit from the car park to the facilities they serve.
From 1st April, Wiltshire Council will be charging Blue Badge holders to park in many of their car parks (that's those in which others not using blue badges already have to pay).
1. Should blue badge holders pay?
2. If blue badge holders have to pay, how easy (or otherwise) is that for them?
3. If blue badge holders don't park in the car parks once payment is introduced, what will they do instead, and what will the ramifications be?
1. Should they pay?
I have a huge sympathy for those who are less able due to physical or other difficulties and feel we have a special duty of care to them. Ideally, in financial terms that should be in helping them by providing decent financial support and let them choose (and pay for) extra services that they need. But this is not an ideal world, and the government choses to buy services for them rather than give them the choice, and in that environment then yes, they should have financial parking concessions.
2. If they have to pay, how easy will it be?
Potentially, it won't be easy. I looked at Kings Street and Central car parks yesterday - the two in my ward - and in both cases the spaces are, correctly, near to the pedestrian exits from the car park. But, incorrect for those who are hard of movement, the pay machines are away across the car park. Worse, the pay machines are notorious for being out of action; yesterday, for example, only the machine at the rear of Central Car Park was in operation. Further, the coin slots are at a level that make them difficult for wheelchair users or others who are height impaired. We are told new machines are coming in. If they are located at the pedestrian exits, are wheelchair accessible, and use a system which allows payment without doubling back to the car, good, but should the introduction of charging the disabled not be deferred until this new system is in place? Otherwise, Wiltshire Council should be challenged under the 2010 Equalities Act - the successor to "Disability Discrimination".
Parkers can also pay by phone. This will work for some, but not for all. An appropriate phone is needed, and a parker who is nimble enough with their fingers an well enough up on the IT stuff. I admit to no personal experience of this - I walk into Melksham as I live close by (very occasionally catch the bus to the far end and walk back). I tried to register at home, but the system was such registration was a process that couldn't be completed until the first time I was parking. The payment by phone system may be a good alternative for some, but it cannot be the only solution for the disabled
3. What if they don't park in WC car parks any longer?
It has been pointed out that Blue Badge holders may park for free, for up to 3 hours, on yellow lines where there is no loading restriction. Yellow lines exist to aid traffic flow, and there is potential for a significant increase in on-street parking by blue badge holders to the detriment of traffic flow.
Blue Badge spaces exist in all supermarket car parks, and the supermarkets include the cost of parking in their pricing of good - so they're free at the point of use. There is a likelihood that some Town Centre business will transfer to the supermarkets.
It is possible that some blue badge holders may use the bus instead, and that some will order online and have a delivery, with some depending on their care services for a facility which they currently use themselves.
I have no measure of the elasticity of these changes, and I have not read any. The best I have seen is a suggestion "let's see how it goes" - however, once people change their habits (and are blocking the streets or shopping out of town) it will be an uphill struggle to persuade them back.
1. It has been stated by Councillor Alford that only 30% of drivers parking with a Blue Badge are disabled, as part of his explanation of the changes. I was puzzled by this at first, but note that some blue badge holders cannot themselves drive, and are passengers in the car - for example a carer driving a very old person, or a mother with a child in a wheelchair with Oxygen tanks to contend with. I am also unsure of cases where someone may have very limited mobility indeed, but not be registered disabled. I have requested clarification of this "30%" and will update this note if I receive it. There IS a good point that some carer drivers MAY be able to leave their dependant at the car while they tootle off to the payment machine.
2. To get myself some idea of where people shop (how important is the Town Centre) is these days, I ran a poll over the last week - across a wider area and potentially skewed because it's a specialist interest forum. But up to date as we come out of legal restrictions and look forward. "Which of these do you use regularly for grocery shopping?". Figures given are percentages, sample size 37, voters allowed to select multiple options (and most did)
35,Corner Store (in person)
49,High Street / Town Centre (in person)
19,Market (in person)
81,Supermarket (in person and take goods home with you)
5,Shopping Mall (in person)
0,Supermarket (choose in person and they deliver)
3,Supermarket (click and collect)
14,Amazon or similar (order online and they deliver)
24,Supermarket (order online and they deliver)
8,Independent online and they have carrier deliver
5,My partner / carer / butler does the regular grocery shopping
0,Don't know - it just turns up
22,Farm shop (in person)
5,Farm shop / regular order and delivered
3. I visited Melksham Town Centre on Friday and Saturday. On Friday, all 8 places in Central Car Park were in use and two cars in the next places (for mother and child too) had blue badges on display. On Saturday, there were five cars in the 8+2 = 10 spaces. One car in a disabled space was not displaying a blue badge. The pay machine nearest the blue badge spaces was "Not in Use". On Saturday (only) I noted 3 spaces in King Street with just one in use.
4. The current "repay" scheme where you can get two (or one, say some signs) of your payment for packing back at certain stores is little used. I put this down to lack of knowledge, confusion as to how it works, and a lot of hassle for the one hour at 30p. Probably costs more to administer than in returned payments.
1. I consider that Wiltshire Council should provide a DDA compliant solution in their own car parks, from which they already collect money from most parkers. It should not be the responsibility of the Town to do what the County should do. However, I would support us taking a pragmatic position and buy parking for blue badge holders in Central Car Park up to a certain price, to be defined. NOT "at any price"
2. I would support a "purple badge" add on to the blue badge for a limited annual fee, allowing holders to park at no extra charge and circumventing the hassle of paying each time.
Edit to add, after a Facebook question on this I may have been a bit short on that as I only mentioned the idea in passing. The idea is an extra that can be purchased for a year and can be displayed in addition to a blue badge, which would entitle the user to park for no extra charge with the blue badge - a sort of parking season ticket, saving the hassle of paying each time (and also encouraging more visits as it would no longer be pay-per-visit). Thanks for noting that my explanation was limited - I'll go back to my blog and see if I can expand it.
3. I would encourage Wiltshire Council to review their decision to charge Blue Badge holders for parking in their car parks while street parking on yellow lines with Blue Badges is allowed, and while payment remains difficult for people who are restricted enough to merit a badge - they are not usually at all easy to obtain.
If readers wish to get in touch with your Wiltshire Councillor, they are Councillors Hubbard, Sankey, Oatley and Alford. It is Wiltshire Coucil who own and run these car parks - your Town Council is looking to "pick up the pieces".
My thanks to the informed discussions with other Town councillors who have help me in looking into this, and has given me the strength of knowledges that I am far from alone on these concerns.
Published Sunday, 27th February 2022
Melksham Town Hall / Ukrainian flagAs from dusk tonight (26th February 2022), Melksham Town Hall
Update - 18:45 Melksham Town Hall now lit in Yellow and Blue - the colours of the Ukrainian flage - in a show of sympathetic support for the people of Ukraine. Image on this post changed to show our Town Hall lit up.
Update - 10:30 Across the UK, many public buildings are being lit with the Ukrainian flag in a show of sympathetic support for the people of Ukraine. Just after lunchtime yesterday, Councillor Rabey proposed via email that we in Melksham should do so too. However, Town Council policy, to which our staff work, includes:
Ordinarily and in the interests of impartiality, the flag of another nation or cause will not be flown. However the Town Mayor in liaison with the Town Clerk may exercise discretion or seek a motion from Council to determine when the Town Council will fly its flag(s) at half-mast and/or fly the flag of another nation state or cause as a mark of respect from the Council and the community in particular circumstances that are deemed to be appropriate.
With the mayor absent at present, the natural (almost automatic) way for an exception to the policy wasn't directly open, and staff really cannot go against policy without a very clear lead. There was a considerable flow of emails yesterday afternoon with the majority of councillors responding. Some expressed concern asking "are others doing this" and "how do we go about it in the absence of the mayor" but in the end all elected members involved in the conversation (I think, looking back) were in favour. The Deputy Mayor is supportive, and one of our councillors is still in touch with the mayor and reported him to be supportive too. So, in effect, a motion from Council unanimously supported and we can dispense with motion notice period, etc - this one was blindingly obvious.
Picture Now - Melksham Town Hall with the colours of the Ukraining flag. Our thanks to Paul Weymouth of Light Fantastic for setting this up ... Paul picture in front of the Town Hall with our Deputy Mayor, Colin Goodhind.
With all this going on, I perhaps other councillors concentrated on working out what to do, and doing the job, without taking the time out to tell our residents what we were doing. Your Town Councillors are volunteers - we all have other interests outside the council, which for some include full time jobs and for some include being Wiltshire Councillors too. So having most of us respond yesterday was remarkable, and have others silent over a few hours only to be expected.
There are other things very much on my Town Councillor's plate at present:
1. I am concerned that we have lost yet another member of our team, once again without reason being given and without even a "thank you for what Xxxxx" has done for us. Far too much of a recurring pattern for my liking. I am advised that it is normal not to give a reason when someone leaves, and that a member of the staffing committee is "completely satisfied with how this has been handled". Sadly, I am not satisfied, and I do not consider it normal for people to leave without thanks for their work or any explanation. There may be exceptional circumstances, but this is a repeating pattern which occupies me. Since I was elected 9 months ago, I know of six staff departures and that feels to be an incredibly high turnover, and a big cost bearing in mind the investment made into staff, and the investment the make in us in return; we are the poorer from the loss of both experienced people, and younger people too who bring an enthusiam but also a need for help and upport as they take a job very early in their career.
2. The decision by Wiltshire Council to start charging blue badge holders to park in their car parks (and increase charges for others, and withdraw the free parking on Sundays and 2 special days designated by the Town Council) is exercising me and other councillors. There are two sections to this issue - (i) should blue badge holders be asked to pay? and (ii) if they are asked to pay, do we actually make it practical for them to pay? There is a whole blog to follow on this - I'm going to leave it to post until tomorrow, along with wider comment on disabled access to the Town Centre.
3. I am concerned at the flow of Town and Town Council information to our residents. The incident I started this post with - the lack of telling you what we were / are doing about the Ukrainian flag is just a syptom of a major concern. I know what I would like to see. The Community Development Committee (which I am not on) meets a week on Monday to hear from their "virtual hub working group"; they are being advised by the mayor helping them draw up a spec of what's needed and I look forward to hearing their proposals. I should add that we have some excellent information flowing out already - the team doing it probably need more effective tools for doing this, and perhaps re-arrangement to get more up there quickly and with a wider readership. And perhaps that's what the working group is looking at.
Published Saturday, 26th February 2022
Melksham South Play AreasA Tours for councillors elected last year organised by the team - I went around on 22nd February 2022. Five play and recreation areas provided and maintained by Wiltshire Council in South Ward.
Although I'm not on the Assets and Amenities Committee, I took advantage of the availability of a place on the tour - the only South Ward representative or resident councillor to do so. Councillors Jacqui Crundell and Colin Goodhind from South Ward are on this committee and if you have any specific queries, I would suggest they are more directly in touch with what's what even though I'm the one writing this up.
A big THANK YOU to the officers who showed us around and gave us an "insider" appreciation of The Council's role and activities
(On map in green) In South Ward, we have:
5. Dorset Crescent - a few pieces of equipment and a large grassy area. High net barrier for no apparent reason - perhaps there was a netball pitch there? Primrose, no more than a few yards away in Melksham East offers much more but perhaps DC still useful to keep children close. Mind, very much a senior area close by.
Play equipment in use - hence no picture of it to be published
1. Hazelwood - a small / local play area which is starting to show its age. I understand that the fence around it has been painted by nearby residents, and the area stuck me as tired but still loved. Easy access to Town Centre via Orchard Gardens, but I suspect little known to many. With a porous gate into the Campus, could be a real asset for visitors to that with small children
2. Lewington - a gem. Small, but modern and in good condition. Well overlooked by houses, so largely self policing. I wondered how long interest in this equipment will last - however, even in February when we looked, mum and two toddlers came along and were enjoying it.
4. Speedwell Close - compact, modern play area for smaller children. Well overlooked from 'supervising' houses.
3. Spring Meadow - a very big area though with sparse and well worn equipment. Serves the lower end of Kenilworth Road estate (Longford Road and Windsor Avenue) as well as the bottom of Campion Drive.
(On map in Blue). Nearby, other play and recreation areas are:
12. KGV (various facilities)
11. The Woody / Clackers Brook
On the map in Grey. - other play area looked after by the Town Council - ranging from a single goal post on a field at Forester's Park to an impressive array of equipment and an even more impressive set of signage at Methuen Avenue.
On the map in Red - public play areas NOT managed by the Town Council. I may have missed some - and neither does my map include any play areas in Melksham Without.
And general notes
* We have an excess of signage - not only immediate instructions but complex bylaw posters too, from various bodies - Town, District, County. Could we unify, standardise, clarify ... perhaps add QR code, online links, phone number. Suggest standard logos - Red for "no" and "green" for yes (orange for "discouraged") to all appear in all parks? Two signs for each location - the "standard" one plus a local choice? Which raises the question of local pride and ownership
* How much are the parks used? It wasn't very much on the bleak February day we went around, but wear and mud suggest that they ARE used at least enough for some of the surfaces / gate areas to become impassable. Get more data? Ask people to tell us?
* We have an incredibly mixed bag ... and I suspect many residents don't know what there is outside there immediate area. Can we better inform and get better use; as we can't / don't charge for use, better use would increase expense. Would fellow councillors consider this a "loss" to be avoided (as putting in to the Assembly Hall is regarded) or a cost (as opening public loos is) which is to be encouraged for the facility it provides?
* Regular patrolling and routine maintenance such as clearing bins and mowing is a considerable load on our team - however, with the possible exception of Dorset and Primrose, the areas are well separated and any reduction in numbers of areas would be a serious degradation of facilities. Conversely, there are a few places (Church Lane, not my ward, and Warwick Crescent) which seem a long way from any.
* The strategy needs to be provided by Assets and Amenities as to update / replace / reduce these areas - whether they wish us to end up with a few smart areas, continue with a mixed bag, invest heavily - but then would that be in things which are just fashionable and not really what the kids want. As was commented - "we have to compete against computer games these days".
Food for thought, thanks for the tour, I look forward to seeing how the councillors concerned and the staff progress this in coming years, and offer my support (for what it's worth) to well justified and well rounded proposals.
Published Wednesday, 23rd February 2022
Waterloo Live - the Assembly Hall's Waterloo?Really good to have "Waterloo Live" at the Assembly Hall last night - a really enjoyable evening, enjoyed by lots of people (around 300) at £20 each (= £6000, plus say another £1000 of bar takings). Good to see a fellow councillor in the audience - perhaps would have been good to see more at this important facility, and on such a fantastic evening.
There's no secret that the Assembly Hall is run down from decades of wear and missed maintenance, and is closely connected to Wiltshire Council's Blue Pool which they expect to demolish later in the year when their Campus opens. The Assembly Hall needs to be saved - not necessarily the same building, perhaps not even on the same site (though where else in the town can we be noisy?) but certainly with that same capacity at least, and with the same 'ownership' of the community too. It's the people far more that the building.
Covid has not been kind to Assembly Hall finances, and sadly the council you elected last May had an absolute majority who declared our organiser of events such as that last night redundant. The remaining team who look after the hall have done a wonderful job, but the days of such events sponsored by your council are running out - 3 months to go, I believe. And then the finances look even more interesting and we hope (and need to work with) other people to organise events. Really a sad decision to cease sponsoring such events, just at the very time that we're all on our way back from Covid.
Funny (peculiar) that your council sees the King George V park, which costs us more to run than it generates in income, as an expense to be accepted, but sees the Assembly Hall, which also costs us more to run than it generates in income, as a loss which must be slashed.
Sad that those councillors who we have ONLY seen in the Assembly Hall when council meeting were held there for Covid distancing are not being supportive of continuing events like last night's at the very time they are clearly making a popular comeback.
Published Sunday, 20th February 2022
Bridge to ASDA?Question asked: "What about a Bridge over the A350 / Melksham bypass to ASDA, like the bridge over the main road to Tesco in Trowbridge?"
It's a good idea to segragate foot, cycle, scooter and powered traffic (cars, buses, lorries) where practical and it works via a bridge in Trowbridge. Coming from the Town Centre and park, pedestrians are already on a higher level and can walk straight ahead onto the bridge. There is then a long ramp down to the Longfield Road area of the town, making the bridge a natural route through. A set of steps down allows access to Tesco, athough those who cannot use steps can carry on down the slope and double back. But the geography in Melksham is different.
1. Foot and cycle bridges need to attract people to use them. And on a piece of flat land as we have around ASDA, the idea of going up and down ramps or steps might put people off. Look at Poole and Lincoln (railway crossings with heavy pedestrian use) and see just how many people wait for the train to pass rather than using the bridge - the bridges and underutilised.
2. New bridges must (legal requirement) be wheelchair accessible - ramps or lifts. In the Melksham location, a ramp would need to double back on itself with either steps in addition (example - Worle) or it would irritate the heck out of users where no steps are provided (example - Ashchurch) or would need lifts (example - Chippenham) at greater and ongoing operational expense.
3. There is already a pedestrian crossing across the road, so traffic is already separate already by time rather than by height. That eats into the amount of traffic than can pass. If a bypass is built avoiding this section of road, the case for a bridge becomes less, but if a bypass is not built (an especially if Bath continues to turn through traffic away from Cleveland Bridge) the case for something to replace the crossing becomes greater - though that still leaves the first two issues.
So - are there other options to get people on foot and cycles to ASDA (and perhsps in future to a new residential across the railway - another story)
A. From the subway to the station under the A350, another subway under the A365 which at that point is at a higher level would connect Old Bath Road, the railway station / Bath Road and the north of the ASDA area on the flat, but with pedestrian traffic segragated from road traffic
B. A footway/cycleway from the entrance to Melksham Cemetry on the verge of the bypass over Challymead Bridge to Farmer's roundabout would provide better connectivity from Melksham South (Hazelwood Road area) to both ASDA and the station area.
The bridge we're talking about is in Melksham (North) ward, so really this is one for Saffey Rabey and Phil Alford - however, option (B) comes into South. I do personally have some background on pedestraian bridges and knowledge of getting to the station, hence my feeling comfortable to comment.
I was also asked about the bypass on by the questioner I am answering. See ((here)) and ((here)) and ((here)) for - copious - comments previously made before (yep, back to my manifesto) and after the Town Council elections.
Please remember - as Town Councillors we have no powers but the power to persuade and inform on so many matter such as these - do have a chat with your Wiltshire Councillor.
Published Saturday, 19th February 2022
Happy to ChatYesterday, I took a trip out to clear the cobwebs of winter, to enjoy the feel of the wind on the hills, the crashing of the waves on the beach, and the tranquillity of wooded glades. 2022 has started with the loss of several good 'professional' friends with whom I've campaigned for many years - fixtures in our landscape, and with the loss of our dog Billy too at the beginning of this month. I have written much on all three. Very, very much remembered with fondness, but the message here is "open for business" as Nigel and Jo would have encouraged, and as Billy would have accompanied and supported me on.
On Weymouth Sea Front, I came across this sign on a bench. "The Happy to Chat Bench. Sit here if you don't mind someone stopping to say 'Hello'". And - my thought - what a good idea. Not for the only bench somewhere, but perhaps one of the benches in the midst of KGV parki. Not really for lonely people to sit there, but rather where people in family or friend groups can sit, and others who perhaps are in need of a few words known they will be welcome, and can, indeed, say "hello". Just a word or two can make a huge difference.
Lisa and I live in a "Happy to Chat" house. We're in South Ward, which I represent (and am learning still how better to represent) on the town council, and our door is open - the physical one not quite at all times (best check ahead I'm going to be around unless you risk taking pot luck), the phone one far more, and the online / message door 24x7 though response is not always immediate. I do want to hear what bugs you and what pleases you, to help (with what few tools I have) you, and perhaps to motivate. And that's whether or not you voted for me. We may have a hedge at the front of our home, but it's porous to reduce the sound of the road, and not solid to block us off from the outside.
Added - 15th February 2022
The idea of a "Happy to Chat" bench has been positively received by Melksham Town councillors - a couple just looking to make sure that it's not the only bench in a part of the town so that there remains seating for those who are preferring their own company. But there are 14 benches around the circuit in the KGV park, and two in particular struck me as good candidates - for a choice of one such bench. As an aside, there are also 5 benches in the Dog Bark, but there is little point in making any of them "Happy to Chat" because people who take their dogs there are very much prepared for interaction! I have also checked with the amenities team who maintain the park, and they have no problem with the idea.
So - where now? At the Town Council's Asset and Amenities Commitee meeting last night (which I watched on Zoom), the subject of extra benches, sponsoring benches (and sponsoring roundabouts mentioned too) came up, and it looks like a whole policy and process will be developed, probably with a report back to the next meeting of that committee on 19th April. I am hopeful, but far from certain, that we may be able to fast track a "Happy to Chat" sign on a single bench before Spring. I would prefer not to wait for a policy to be decided and implemented and an application made ... by which time it could be high summer or even autumn, but other may take the view that suggestions such as mine which are in the pipeline should wait until the policy is set.
Published Sunday, 13th February 2022
Campus - what to do with other public assets"Melksham Campus" will open later this year. And the library and the swimming pool will move into the new building. I was on the "SCOB" - Shadow Campus Operation Board - a decade ago, and at that time the plan was a single site facility for Wiltshire Council, with eight (I think it was) eight other properties / sites being sold off. Some are outside the town (in Melksham Without), and at least one other has, I think, been removed from the Unitary Council's books already. But what happens to the remaining properties? And while that question's being addressed, wouldn't it be a good idea to take a wider view and at least give some thought as to how their future will fit in with the future of other Wiltshire Council and Town Council assets.
We should be mindful of what's wanted for the future at this time that so many things are moving around all at once and perhaps life expired, and we're also seeing major social changes brought on by climate change, covid, and the information age all of which were absent last "time around".
On Monday evening, Melksham Town Council appointed three members to meet with Wiltshire Council members and officers to discuss publicly owned assets in Melksham; those three are Councillors Simon Crundell, Pat Aves and myself, and a first meeting was held via Teams the following night. There are some tough questions to be asked; at this stage, over a very short period, we'll be looking at the scope and the art of the possible, and how things fit in with aspirations and affordability. Serious stuff, in co-ordination with other work and papers such as Priority for People, the Neighbourhood Plan and the Local Plan. And previous work, reports and ideas to be used as tools for us to learn from - repeat the good and avoid the bad.
Rather than speculate on what could be done and worry people with silly early ideas, I bring you an idea from the Wiltshire Times in 1955 who's time has passed. This didn't happen ... neither did the plan to put a road through from The Bear to the Church Street Car Park, demolishing historic buildings but it just might have meant that we could be considering a pedestrianised High Street now.
Published Wednesday, 26th January 2022
Town precept - how Melksham comparesThis bar chart shos how the Town council precept in Melksham compares to the other towns in Wiltshire for the current year. With the only exceptions being towns with a strong MOD presence (where it's the MOD rather than the civil local council who do much of the provision), we have the lowest town precept in the county and will continue to do so next year - unless some other town decides to make a huge cut.
Readers who live in (rural) parishes rather than towns will find that their parish council precept is much lower - almost without exception. That's because Town Councils provide facilities for their wider community area - town centre street scene, public loos, parks, halls, information and much more at the expense of the people who live in their designated "built up" area but for the benefit of their wider economic catchment.
"Unfair" you might say - "why should we pay for the non-residents" - and you would probably be right. But I suspect we need to be pragmatic and accept that situation - continuing our charitable gift of a town that welcomes (and pays for) people from "the villages". The alternative is for the Town Council to start charging for the use of parks, toilets, the Town Centre, etc - we already charge for use of the Assembly Hall. Perhaps the idea is not so stupid - watching on the news over Christmas, Bristol is talking about charging organised groups in their parks, and perhaps folks like ParkRun and Party in the Park and the River and Food festival should be paying [more] to the Town Council.
Published Saturday, 1st January 2022
Review of 2021I've tried to write a Christmas update for family and friends multiple times over the past couple of week. I start by saying "we're doing fine" and "nothing much has happened", but then I start writing further and realise the first bit ("we're doing fine") is true - couldn't be finer - but the second part (the "nothing much has happened") is not (!) exactly true.
That's the "Management Summary" - read on if you dare, or if you have hours to waste! I will try to "theme" things through what has been a complex year!
• Canine Section
• Family Section
• Holiday Section
• House, Garden, Car Section
• Railway Section
• History Section
• Bus Section
• Town Council Section
• This Christmas Section
• What will we do in 2022 Section and summary
As we entered 2021, we were looking forward to meeting Olive - in foster in Bristol - with a view to her joining our family shortly thereafter; sadly, the meeting didn't go ahead and indeed Olive struggled in her foster home and the rescue took her into kennels for long term work. We never met Olive - purely working on what we told largely on emails, so while we had misgivings they have to remain only that, and we hope Olive come through the rescue system well.
"We have a place for a dog to join our getting-grumpy-old-man" we said to ourselves and to contacts and a few places, and we met Nora and Moo in Bath. Lovely dogs, but that bit too much for Billy so we passed; Lisa felt that Moo - a Pondeco - was a bit much for her too ;-).
And so ... thumbing through web sites ... I came across Lulu at Dog's Trust, Newbury where our Gyp - who's passing in '20 left such a hole. Brindle would be nice for a chance - check. Greyhound or lurcher - check. Girl - check. Young but not puppy - check. Not an ex-racer - oops. To be re-home with Lightning - a black boy x racing greyhound ... double oops. "Silly idea" say I to Lisa ... and of course silly ideas are always the best, and we met Lulu and Lightning several times, and the bonded pair came to live with us in May.
I'm writing this during the night. Billy is asleep up against me, Lulu is on Lisa's feet and Lightning is in a dog bed on the floor; not always like this - it could be just about any of the three anywhere, and from behind we have to look at the tail tip to see Lightning's white flash. But what an eventful six months since they joined us!
Lightning came frightened of people, vehicles driving past, and his own shadow. As a "three year" project. He trailed a light lead to help restrain him - though we managed to get rid of that within a couple of weeks. To this day, he prefers to be on the open french window side of us, but he will sneak upstairs and settle down, give us "kisses" and so on - he's excited but yet frightened at the same time. Lovely dog - delighted he's one of our family and we totally overlook all those "oops"es.
And what of Lulu - a lovely, cheeky girl with such a different character - pushy and, it has proven, accident prone. She came with a great scar around her neck and no history about it. And - oh my goodness - running around the garden with Lightning the two of them ran up the mown grass / compost heap and leapt the fence - while out for a week in the early midsummer dawn. He made it - she didn't and skinned one of her legs in the iron spike railings.
No pictures of Lulu's leg - we would be banned from Facebook - and there was a question mark over whether the leg could be saved. Local operation, then a further operation with a specialist veterinary surgeon. Skin graft from her chest to her leg ("why has your dog got a nipple on her knee") and dressing every two days - initially sedated because she was in such pain. Cone of shame - which she hated and managed to manipulate so it helped her get at the very leg she shouldn't. Then a medical shirt while the graft site healed, and and medical trousers (with braces attaching to the shirt) to keep the leg dressings safe.
I have lost count of how many times we drove to Bath. Two return trips twice a week at first, then reducing to a single round trip once she didn't have to be sedated and in all day. Gradually extending from every three days to four, five, and a week. Final trip - 26th October - but still healing right across the knee joint even to this day. Excellent news was that she came with initial insurance; not so great that we blew the limit in getting her fixed - but you do, don't you?" So she's cost us the price of that cruise from Southampton around South America - but then that's been cancelled due to covid anyway, and Lulu is ... incomparable. And able, once again, to give Lightning a run for his money. Tough as old boots, strong as an ox, headstrong as [insert comparative word]. And fortunately very much a family member. I walked her, early September and still in trousers, through the middle of the Food and River festival. Perfect, amazing considering what she's been through, or perhaps because of it.
Lulu went along to the Great Global Greyhound Walk on 19th September too - another 75 hounds there - and was walked for a while by our MP while I briefed her on - oh, that will come later! See "Railway".
Billy is getting older and stiffer, and is now on a special diet to help his kidneys. He can still jump up onto the chair and bed though he needs to think about it a bit more, and asks to be invited - which we have to do with hand signals as he's now almost totally deaf. Bright, bright dog though - he's leart canine sign language very quickly.
This section will - dare I say it - be as short and the canine one was long. Chris and family in Amesbury, Kim and family in the Southampton area and Tyler, who has moved up from Florida to Georgia, all report that life and times continue. Proud of them all and what they do and achieve - but very much their stories to tell and not mine. Aspects of covid has kept us physically apart far more than I would wish and that's led to a growing apart which I have to regret; I also have to admit that covid may only be part of that story as our worlds are very different - I'm really not cut out to be a grandad and it rather shows.
You change during a lifetime, don't you? We have gone from "I would never cruise" to "when is our next cruise?". Everything was cancelled in 2020, and indeed in early 2021. We took the opportunity this August to take a week on P&O's new ship "Iona" from Southampton to Southampton - a non-landing cruise to - err Iona, in the Hebrides with a cruise around Mull and around Arran in the Clyde Estuary. A view of Fingal's cave on Staffa - memories of a trip with Gran in 1976 (+- 1 year)
We worried that "Iona" has twice the passenger capacity of our favourite "Aurora" but in practice we need not have worried; she's well designed and we didn't feel overpowered. We might - but were not - concerned about a smallish cabin and being in each other's pockets all the time. Lisa and I seem to be so much together - still so much to say and talk about after all these years, and both with a considerable element of "doing our own thing". More of those things below.
Our good friend Justin - who lives in Somerset - came up and dog-sat and house-sat. Our three love playing with his Jack Russell "Finn", and Justin has a holiday / break too. Can't thank Justin enough for what we does.
If Iona to Iona was our 2020 holiday, Iona to the Canary Islands in the second half of November was our 2021 holiday. The first time I have been to Madeira or the Canaries, and a chance to look around Cadiz and Lisbon on the way back. We are disinclined to take organised trips when in the ports and these days that can be slightly intimidating. But still we remain happy with our own company and with meeting casually others over dinner; all tend to be in the second rather than the first half of life and most have interesting stories. Most make us realise how lucky we are to have each other, and to so closely share views on nearly every subject, but they are superb acquaintances.
House, Garden, Car Section
Just material things ... OK - we are now growing some of our vegetables, we have help with the main garden (thank you, Doug) and as I write we have a new greenhouse awaiting its glazing. The smaller rear lawn has been destroyed by "Zoomies" and we need to be careful that the bigger front one doesn't go that way. For those who know it, we have allowed our "rear quarter" to go wild since Lulu's accident. Doug - if you're reading this - it looks really good (if he's not reading it, it looks good too!!)
Not had much done to the house - Lisa still looking out for dramatic improvements to the Kitchen, and to sorting out the Museum room but time on her history work has taken precedence. I tend to stack papers up all around as I write should probably find time to clear up a couple of rooms - build a magnificent archive which, however, lacks order and therefore not much use after I am gone.
We HAVE redone "The Cottage" - that's the outbuilding formerly used as a laundry at the front of our garden, and it's now a meeting room with a capacity of 12 (5 or 6 with 2 metre social distancing), and set up with projection, broadband and cabling so we can plug in there and run hybrid meetings - in real life up to the capacity of the room, plus dozens online. It's a bit rudimentary, but it works well and the very limited equipment can be used to set up meetings elsewhere - up to 100 on 20th October but that's another story.
Almost all of our driving has been in our electric Nissan Leaf. Lovely little car and what we need for the local trips including all those runs to the Bath Vet. We rarely take others and indeed the rear seats are a padded dog bed / dog stretcher from taking Lulu; big, big thanks to Steve for helping out with the very early journeys when Lulu needed what was virtually a pet ambulance.
Our Chrysler 'people mover' is back on the road - after 2 years - but annual milage being kept right down, and public transport trips have dropped like a stone too - my trips in the year 2021 are probably no more than my trips in a month in 2019 - and in that story, replicate by people all over the country, lies the very great difficult problem that's facing public transport.
I am going to try and summarise here, aware it's a bit specialist interest for many readers.
Early in the year, it became clear that my offer to help as a volunteer at the Melksham Hub Cafe - probably on "early opens" where I felt my prior hospitality / catering, and rail, experience would be useful was not going to be taken up. Once I admitted that to myself, it came almost as a relief - my name had remained on the TransWilts website and web app right up to that time, and I was sick and tired of irate phone calls from people feeling they had been wrongly penalty charged for car parking at the station, and further inflamed by the lack of initial response from an email box that no longer reached me. And that led to a window of time available in mind and schedule to try for Town Council. Out of sequence in these notes, I also resigned my shareholding as a friend of TransWilts in the summer so that I can speak at Council on the subject when it comes up - be it in support of their activity, or to help suggest they come back later where others on the Town Council are suggesting outright rejections of further funding requests.
The Melksham Railway User Group has widened its scope to the Melksham Transport User Group - and indeed there is and should be far more crossover between buses and trains. Having said which, the year has been a peculiar one as we have spent much of it informing rather than encouraging public transport travel, and Great Western have had enormous difficulty in providing the trains they have in their timetable. At a station like Melksham, cancellation of even one train means a two hour gap, and inconsistent information and alternative provision puts off all but the hardiest and desperate. Made double-bad for journeys with connections to or from other lines - double jeopardy if you like. So we have been much more supporting existing users rather than trying to promote new users to something that is broken.
Santa had planned to visit us on 5th December, but our officers got together in good time, and with Covid concerns and the close contact we would inevitably have had on the day, we suggested that people see Santa the previous day in Melksham; tough choice that one, but with some grandparents expressing worries we felt we should take a cautious line, and also help them by avoiding them having to make hard individual calls. In hindsight, the right call - though one we regretted having to make.
In March, I joined the Committee of the West Wilts Rail User Group - a logical step to have a Melksham rep there for what's the second largest town in the West Wilts district. Melksham is off on something of a branch - the other stations of Avoncliff, Bradford-on-Avon, Trowbridge, Westbury, Dilton Marsh and Warminster all being on the "mainline that government forgot" - the Cardiff to Portsmouth line. So expectation was that I would be rather a minor contributor. Funny how things turn out ...
The four main West Wilts stations have - or rather had - through service to London dating back to the days of British Railways, run by South West Trains for many years and then by South Western Railway when they took over the franchise a couple of years ago. We were - dumbfounded - to read in a stakeholder consultation from SWR for 2023 that these trains were to be withdrawn from December 2021 and that was already decided and outside the consultation scope.
Now - I appreciate that service need to change over the years, with those that have outlived their usefulness giving way to something better. Small problem here - these trains were very busy indeed, and the alternatives suggested involved cramming onto equally busy GWR trains to Salisbury, and waiting there for nearly an hour, or making multiple changes to get to the same destination in London, including a tube journey. The alternatives would work well for the fit, healthy, informed regular traveller who wasn't too worried about cost or inconvenience (the sort of person who works for SWR or the Department for Transport who specify services these day), but they are awful for most users. On doing a Freedom of Information request to find out how this decision had been reached, we eventually got copies of a heavily redacted set of emails from February to May in which SWR and DfT seem to have got together and looked at how they could reduce costs, characterising the service all through as "Bristol to Salisbury" and saying it duplicated GWR, overlooking many matters such as the SWR services providing the only direct trains from London to Trowbridge. By being economic with the facts in their data, SWR and DfT painted the change as a small local matter ... what limited information coming out just at the start of August making no mention what so ever of London (or indeed of West Wilts towns).
Long story, cutting short ... we lost the service. In spite of massive support from public, local transport authorities, watchdogs, MPs, user groups along the line who all came together in a public meeting. Six user groups came together and I found myself as the creator of a petition which gathered 6,300 signatures and co-ordinating a public meeting. It was raised in the House of Commons, where one of our MPs was referred on by one minister to another (who has moved on from the DfT now) but no change outcome.
I travelled on the last SWR round trip from Bristol to London and back on 10th December - very busy all the way, with people who still hadn't heard this was the last service making their long distance journeys - lots of luggage, few "last day special" travellers. The very last SWR train left Bristol at 22:25 with more than 100 passengers on board. I left it at Bath to get the last bus to Melksham and crowds surged to join the train. As it pulled out, people were standing all up the aisles - and it should be noted that there was no significant "last service" crowd. These are people who would have wanted to travel the following week too.
It's invidious to try and draw a line and thank some people and not others - core team at the final meeting with SWR - Mark, Richard and Bryony - are names I cannot leave out. But many many others have helped so much.
Looking forward - where one door closes, our team looks to open another - and indeed there are other doors already opening. See "2022" ;-)
My online Coffee Shop - http://www.passenger.chat/ - continues to thrive and keep me happily busy. "Steady as she goes". Huge thanks to the moderator and admin team if they're reading this, and to Vicki for all her work earlier in the year on updating the badly corroded Acronyms and abbreviations section. A really good AGM in Didcot - addressed by GWR MD Mark Hopwood and really interesting Q&A section - a hybrid meeting with a couple of dozen in person and also on line. "If it ain't bust, don't fix it" so no immediate plans for anything dramatic - but always one eye to the future.
I remain on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest, where we provided valuable linkage between community transport groups, politicians, rail industry and others - mostly quietly behind the scene. Often, it has to be admitted, so quietly that no-one realises. I remain very much a lightweight - a junior - at TWSW and 2022 will be the final year of my three; I very much doubt I will stand again, great bunch though they are.
Lisa has been ... consistently busy ... through 2021 with her Melksham People Historic data, leading to daily posts of "on this day" births, marriage, deaths and notable news. And this has lead to many other interesting avenues of exploration - often long research for people who live in Melksham or whose families used to.
2022 will bring the release of Census data from 100 years ago ... watch this space, and I hope Lisa still emerges from time to time from her keyboard!
What a year of ups and downs! "Bus Back Better" - the government announcement in March putting £5bn into bus improvements, adding in the community as partners in specifying services, connecting up individual train and bus routes, bus priority, sorting our fares, electric buses, decently frequent services - evenings and Sundays too, and buses going where they will be useful in the future helping reduce traffic and carbon consumption.
Across the UK, the idea of the local transport authority and operators working with the bus user community, and looking to grow services rather than cut and cut, has been novel and in many places very hard for them to get to grips with. And communities have had few user community organisations able to take on the role. I have a slide set from an online meeting we held in March asking "who should do this?" and coming to the conclusion that there really was no organisation there or looking to step up to do it. In Wiltshire, we are very fortunate in that we had something of a head start - work from 2016 on Option 24/7 has proposed things remarkably in line with Bus Back Better and from that time we had established a good relationship with Council Officers.
Lee (I must single him out) has put the most enormous work in on this in the county, and we (Lee, Peter and I) are working with others such as the new Somerset Bus Partnership. We have a structure document (constitution) and representatives active and making local service thoughts and recommendations in the 19 community areas. Bus Back Better called for a "Bus Service Improvement Plan" by the end of October - Wiltshire's was duly submitted with some tuning from Option 24/7, and costed. And now we wait to find the outcome of that costed plan - how much (if any) Wiltshire is granted from a fund 5 times oversubscribed, and without indication yet of how it will be allocated within the bids - how much local flexibility and how much micromanagement there will be.
Sadly, it's not that simple. Bus passenger numbers have fallen off a cliff because of Covid, and the grants to cover it come to an end in three months. We understand that BBB funds are tightly tied to improvements and cannot be used to fill the funding gap. There's a severe driver shortage too, and some of our politicians saying that electric cars and not better public transport is where we should be going. Net result - bus service registrations for much reduced or cancelled corridors being made for the end of January. The long term intent sounds good. Pity that the short term goings on are doing the exact opposite. And we are especially worried about bus services that cross between juristictions such as the D1, 271/2/3 and X31 from Wiltshire to WECA and x34 from Wiltshire to Somerset.
Town Council Section
I have said in the past that I wouldn't stand for a council - at the local election 5 years ago, geography I lived in a ward I hardly knew in a different parish. And I felt that I didn't have the wide range of knowledge to be able to represent on all necessary topic. I had also witnessed public attacks on councillors, and wasn't sure of my desire or ability to stand up to them. By March 2021, we had moved into Melksham South Ward (which I know) and it's a four member ward, allowing me to represent on topics I know and pass on items to other councillors where they have the knowledge and I don't. Over the years, I have become rather more robust to standing up too. So - with full support from Lisa, talking with councillors in other places, and anticipate voluntary work in the station cafe not coming my way, it was logical to throw my hat into the ring - if I didn't try in 2021, then I probably never would.
I chose to stand independently and didn't approach any of the parties, nor the new "Together for Melksham" team which had come together to market themselves under a single banner. And that brought a huge learning curve - and allowed me to make decisions which I felt were right, irrespective of whether that lost or gained me votes. Lisa helped me putting together literature in which I chose to include my signifiant views, and back them up with a thorough web site. Literature was delivered to every letter box (except those which requested not), but I chose not to knock on doors to canvass - very happy to talk with people I met. Thank you to the people who helped with the leaflets; a small enough area for me to reach every letter box once in person, though.
Well - in spite of "breaking conventional rules", I found myself elected. 15 councillors - 8 "Together for Melksham", 5 Conservative, 1 Liberal Democrat ... and myself, the only one elected on an independent ticket. An unexpected outcome but, dear reader, one I was fully prepared to take the consequences for and indeed I've said right through that I'm there if they want me (and health allows) for at least two terms - that's to 2029
STEEP learning curve. A flurry of early meetings, deciding on who was on which committee (to which the groupings came with their pre-discussed lists) and votes on re-organisation. On some of there I didn't appreciate the significance of at the time. I was one of only two councillors present who did not vote in favour of a staff reduction - quite simply, we were handed paper with 5 minutes to read and consider, and with the option to discuss for as long as we wanted, but not to go away and think about it. And much as I would prefer (and do in most votes) go along with the others, in this case I could not do so.
The effect of dispensing with two senior positions, and the subsequent loss of three other staff, stretches those who remain. Whilst the team members are all excellent, as could have been predicted there are tasks that have been dropped, and skills and knowledge lost with others looking to pick those elements up rapidly and throughly.
The only Committee I sit on is "Economic Development and Planning" - taking a look at planning applications and making our advisory views known to Wiltshire Council. My view is that there should be an assumption to let people make sensible smaller changes without hinderance, and I'm saddened that at times we have to recommend rejection based on road dangers created or cutting off a neighbour's light when they (often architects and for some big projects) should know better. Other committees - Staffing, Assets and amenities, Community development, and Finance admin and performance - I do not sit on, nor have I yet asked to be an alternate when another member cannot make it - no great surprise as it's natural for alternates to be chosen by a councillor who cannot attend from within his party/team. I'm not unhappy - the one committee I'm on is the one that meets most frequently and it allows me to concentrate on what I know - just don't expect me to know first hand about the Round House or Council electric bills.
For our first couple of meetings in the Assembly Hall, social distanced, we had Zoom and Youtube feeds for members of the public. And it worked well. From the beginning of August, though, meetings were moved to the Town Hall, to use a newly installed system there. Although it was said to have been tested it didn't work on 9th August where we had a large public gathering looking to speak on the item about the Assembly Hall, where one option on the table was mothballing the building. There was concern that the option had been put deep in the public agenda pack without where it could have easily been missed, at minimum (3 working days) notice during the holiday period.
Cutting a long story short, we still don't have a working AV system to let us use Zoom and Youtube for meetings. There's no legal requirement for us as a council to offer remote access, but I would very much like it to be available to aid local democracy. I think I'm allowed to tell you that in a secret session (which I asked and had my vote recorded as not being secret) a group of three councillors has been appointed to progress the provision of remote access to our meetings. All three volunteered, and I am not one of them.
Melksham's Assembly Hall is a longstanding institution and a unique venue which brings in people over an area far larger than just Melksham Town, and not just to the hall but also to other businesses in the town. It's overdue in maintenance needs, attached to the Blue Pool owned by Wiltshire Council which is probably going to be demolished next year, and has seriously lost money and required council (ratepayer) support over the last two years of Coronavirus. Of course, lots of other things are supported by the ratepayer - the Town Council does not charge for the use of the facilities at King George V, or the toilets, and helps fund groups as diverse as the Citizens Advice Bureaux and the people who run Canberra.
The coming of what was potentially a turning point for the Assembly Hall and all the people who use it, love it, benefit from it (indirectly or otherwise) lead to something of an outcry and the option to mothball it was taken off the table in a farce of a council meeting packed as much as could be in the Council Chamber, and with at least the same number again being denied sound access remotely because of the AV system running as just a V (pictures but no sound) system.
It led to a "what now" question with the formation of the Friends of Melksham Assembly Hall - a private Facebook group (all welcome - just that content is not public visible) at https://www.facebook.com/groups/fomah with 224 members and counting, and a web presence via http://www.fomah.org.uk . Huge enthusiasm and indeed a separate writeup needed - meetings hosted here in our Cottage (some people in the room, others remote - it can be done!) and a real intent to help in ways that it would almost certainly have been available, but not encouraged in the past. As yet, much unanswered including how we best persuade those who appear to be throwing hurdles in our way to be more constructive, and the elephant in the room of ongoing maintenance of the fabric of the hall and funding through a year when the budget / income / expenditure is an educated guess.
Each year, the Town Council sets its precept - the amount of money it asks for in Council Tax - and based on that, its expenditure plans too. Discussions start in the Autumn and should be set by Christmas. Three options were on offer this year, with "Together for Melksham" councillors taking up the idea of taking a loan of up to £1 million to be paid back over 20 years rather than increasing our charge. A couple of other options were offered, more in the form of "controls" giving the councillors the choice between doing nothing for the town but stand still, do all the projects we would like at an unrealistic rate rise, or take this loan. Many of us weren't happy with the loan which has not been put to the electorate in anyone's election campaign a few months earlier, and would saddle each household with a debt of hundreds of pounds for "investments" in things like public toilets, playground equipment and a CCTV system which would be life expired long before the debt was fully repaid. I do have to agree a loan could make us popular, allowing us to do some really good things without us having to get people to pay for them until after we are gone. In the end, a fourth option was tabled - a 3% precent increase (equivalent to the cost of a large doner kebab per household over the year) and in a late and extended session a filibuster was overcome and this alternative was accepted, with six of the eight councillors elected on a "together for Melksham" ticket voting against, 8 including myself voting for it, with one abstention. I am happy to stand by the decision, which increases our charge by less than the rate of inflation, and leaves a flexibility to handle issues such as the Assembly Hall through to March 2023 as appropriate under Covid; I really doubt than a delay in setting the precept into the New Year of 2022 would have produced magic firm figures for the following year, and I can't help wondering if those who wanted to delay were planning to apply persuasion to certain fellow councillors to go for the loan.
I should be looking forward here - talking of the proposed Melksham Bypass which has split opinion across the town (and which I have plentifully blogged about), and of the Neighbourhood plan which helps strengthen residents' hands when planning permission is sought for new homes - we can't stop the expansion of the town, but we can help guide where it goes and how it's done. The plan was a very great deal of excellent work by others (I was only on the distant periphery, not selected for that committee) and has already had some effect. Sadly, it has to all be done again as it takes so long there's another round due for the next future period.
Putting on my public transport - and the greening of public transport - hat, I was delighted to find the "Priority for People" survey going live shortly after I was elected. An excellent enquiry of residents, useful because it reaches people who do not normally use public transport and asks them "why not" and gives generous write-in boxes to allow for real data to be collected and it's not just a box-ticking exercise. The report from our consultant was really valuable; it's informed me for some of the bus stuff and I really hope it can be further used. Sadly, the ongoing forum was set up as a professional's talking shop and it took me some effort to even get an invite; the departure through redundancy of the member of the Town staff who was piloting this does not, in my view, bode well for it to be an ongoing source of data to inform the town's future direction - the priority is for cheapness, not for people.
And, chronologically final but of the key roles in the last fortnight has been sitting on a staff member's appeal panel. No details allowed, save to say I'm proud of my fellow panel members and this was such an important thing. We put in so many hours ... and rightly so.
This Christmas Section
Quietly at home. Just the five of us. Very limited outings indeed; we're happy with that and will catch up with family when the days are getting warmer and longer again, and when we're past the peak of the current covid transmissions.
What will we do in 2022 Section
On what we know ... each of the "plans" thought through, with options "B" and "C" considered in case they turn out to be better, and with a jar marked "left field" for the unexpected to be taken up should we see fit. Me thinks a separate series of targetted thoughts will be more effective, and if I say "next year" I still have a week to write them. This also allows me to move on from some of the less than positive elements to look forward in spite of hurdles and worries around at the moment.
I promised - or warned - Lisa decades ago when she moved to the UK that I hadn't - and wouldn't have - a conventional 9 to 5 life style with typical hobbies and leisure activities. So glad I didn't put her off - that this is a rich tapestry of life for both of us. I certainly could not be doing what I do without her and I would certainly not be as happy nor feel as secure - I really must finish with a "Thank you" to her; they say such relationships only come once in a lifetime and we certainly have both looked back and wondered at what we might have achieved together had we met in or just after our youth though we would have lost wonderful familys.
Goodness - have you really read all of this? Thank you - I am impressed by your persistence. Have a great Christmas (if any is left after all of this ...) see you - in real life, or virtually, real soon. Thinking of all our friends and family at Christmas.
Published Friday, 24th December 2021